CAPA Format & Template — Free Excel Download (with Filled Example)

2026-06-17

Download a free CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) format and Excel template — with a filled example and a field-by-field guide. Aligned to ICH Q10, US FDA 21 CFR 211/820, EU GMP and India's revised Schedule M.

CAPA Format and Template — Free Excel Download with Filled Example

If you're here, you want a CAPA format you can actually use — not another lecture. So here it is: a ready-to-use CAPA (Corrective and Preventive Action) template in Excel, the field-by-field guide to filling it, and a fully worked example. It's built to match what US FDA, EU GMP and India's revised Schedule M inspectors expect to see.

Download the CAPA template (Excel) — free, no sign-up. Copy it into your QMS and adapt the fields to your SOP.

What a CAPA format must contain

A defensible CAPA record has these fields. This is the template — every column earns its place because an inspector will ask about it.

FieldWhat goes in it
CAPA No. / Date raisedUnique ID + date logged
Source / TriggerDeviation no., OOS no., complaint no., audit ref
DescriptionWhat happened, where, batch/product affected
Risk classificationMinor / Major / Critical
Correction (immediate)Containment taken right away (quarantine, line stop)
Root causeMethod used (5 Whys / Fishbone / FMEA) + the actual cause
Corrective action(s)Action · owner · target date
Preventive action(s)Same problem prevented on other lines/products/sites
Change control refIf a process/SOP/spec change is needed
Effectiveness checkCriteria · due date · evidence · verdict
StatusOpen / Overdue / Closed
QA closureApprover · date

A filled CAPA example

Abstract templates are easy to fill in badly. Here's the same template completed for a real-world case:

FieldExample entry
CAPA No. / DateCAPA-2026-014 · 12 Jun 2026
Source / TriggerOOS-2026-031 — moisture content out of specification, Batch B-4471
DescriptionTablet moisture 4.8% vs spec ≤ 3.0% on Compression Line 2; batch quarantined
RiskMajor
CorrectionBatch B-4471 quarantined; Line 2 held pending investigation
Root cause5 Whys → dehumidifier on Line 2 failed; failure not caught because it was not on the preventive-maintenance schedule
Corrective actionRepair/replace dehumidifier; add it to PM schedule — Owner: Engineering, due 20 Jun 2026
Preventive actionAudit dehumidifiers on Lines 1, 3, 4 and add all to PM schedule — Owner: Engineering, due 30 Jun 2026
Change controlCC-2026-009 (PM schedule revision)
Effectiveness checkNext 3 batches on Line 2 within moisture spec + PM record shows dehumidifier serviced — due 31 Jul 2026
StatusOpen
QA closure— (pending effectiveness check)

Notice the root cause is a system gap (missing from PM schedule), not "operator error" — and the preventive action extends the fix to the other lines before they fail. That's the difference between a CAPA that closes and one that comes back.

How to fill each field (the parts people get wrong)

The CAPA process behind the template

  Trigger (deviation / OOS / complaint / audit / trend)
        -> Initiate + risk-assess  -> Correction (contain)
        -> Root cause analysis     -> CAPA plan (corrective + preventive)
        -> Implement (train, update SOP/BMR)
        -> Effectiveness check  --(not effective)--> re-open / escalate
        -> QA closure -> feeds the APQR

CAPA is fed by the rest of your quality system — deviations and the wider QMS, OOS investigations, market complaints and product recalls — and every closed CAPA rolls up into the Annual Product Quality Review.

Why CAPA is required (regulatory basis)

From template to live system

A Word/Excel template is a fine start, but on paper CAPA breaks at the seams: the deviation is in one file, the CAPA in another, the effectiveness check in a third, and nobody has a single view of what's open and overdue. A workflow-based quality system fixes that structurally — every CAPA links to its source deviation/OOS/complaint, the effectiveness check is a scheduled stage that can't be skipped, a live dashboard shows open/overdue/recurring CAPAs, and a built-in audit trail supports ALCOA+ data integrity by design.

Frequently asked questions

What is the CAPA format?

A CAPA format is the standard record structure for a Corrective and Preventive Action: CAPA number, source/trigger, description, risk, correction, root cause, corrective and preventive actions, change-control reference, effectiveness check, status and QA closure. Download the Excel template above.

Is the CAPA template free to download?

Yes — the Excel template above is free and needs no sign-up. Adapt the fields to your own SOP and numbering.

What is the difference between correction and corrective action in CAPA?

A correction is the immediate fix to the symptom (e.g. quarantine the batch). A corrective action eliminates the root cause so the problem does not recur.

What is a CAPA effectiveness check?

A verification, after a defined period, that the corrective/preventive action actually prevented recurrence — backed by objective evidence. Without it a CAPA cannot be properly closed.

Which regulations require CAPA?

ICH Q10, US FDA 21 CFR 211/820, EU GMP, and India's revised Schedule M.


Flobri runs CAPA as a connected digital workflow — linked to its source deviation, OOS or complaint, with root cause capture, a scheduled effectiveness check, a live overdue-CAPA dashboard and a built-in audit trail — so CAPA is a system you can prove, not a folder you hope holds up. See how Flobri turns a process description into a live workflow.

Tags: CAPA formatCAPA templateCAPA format downloadCAPA template excelCAPA format in excelCAPA report formatcorrective and preventive action templateCAPA exampleroot cause analysiseffectiveness check